Opinion

 

Editorials, Vol. 4, 2012

Medication Errors Result from Current Medication Reconciliation Practices: It’s Time to Adopt Participatory Reconciliation

Participatory reconciliation has the potential to prevent many costly, or even lethal, medication errors.

Read More
Letters, Vol. 4, 2012

Another Mental Health Professional Shares Her “Self-Care” Story

In this reply to a recent JoPM article, a psychologist shares her own insights and experiences about self-care, as a patient and a clinician.

Read More
Editorials, Vol. 4, 2012

Making Every Second Count – What We Can Do As Patients

Let’s face it, the good old days when you could schmooze with your doctor are long gone. But there are ways for patients to make every second count during brief office visits.

Read More
Editorials, Vol. 4, 2012

Never Enough Time for Patient Care — What Can We Do?

Doctors and patients spend an average of about seven minutes together during an office visit. Patients often leave with more questions than answers, and the result is just bad care. Co-Editor-in-Chief Charlie Smith recommends a participatory solution to the problem.

Read More
Editorials, Vol. 4, 2012

Participatory Medicine: Must You Be Rich to Participate?

Participatory medicine requires patients who take an active role in their health care and providers who have time to listen and work together in a partnership with patients. We fear that this movement may be leaving too many people behind.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

The Rewards of Being a Participatory Health Care Provider

The author gives the provider’s perspective on the story of a woman who became an engaged advocate for her two disabled sisters, and touches on some of the principle tenets of participatory medicine that guided their work together.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

Medication Adherence: More than Reminders

Focusing on reminders alone ignores the many other factors that contribute to nonadherence, improper use, and potentially harmful results. Better patient-provider communication is crucial to solving these problems.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

A Skydiver Jumps, and an Online Community Exults

A cancer patient shares a joyful story with her online support group and is surprised to learn how much it means to her fellow members.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

My 8-Point Participatory Philosophy: What Makes Me a Participatory Patient

The author reflects on the eight attributes that make up her personal definition of a participatory patient.

Read More
Letters, Vol. 3, 2011

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Why Can’t We Protect Doctors Who Put Patients First?

A reader expresses his frustration over a system that condemns doctors who try to humanize medicine through social media.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

Sharks, Bees, and Health Privacy Paranoia

The issue that the e-patient community should be focusing on, in regard to health information exchange, is accuracy. Inaccurate health data hurts people far more frequently and significantly than privacy violations.

Read More
Editorials, Vol. 3, 2011

Welcome New Co-Editors Joe and Terry Graedon

The Journal welcomes new “consumer” Co-Editors Joe and Terry Graedon.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

Who Gets to Define Quality?

After three years of looking at US health care, trying to figure out why it refuses to improve, I have a humble but impatient suggestion: When we talk about quality, we should only include measures that patients agree define quality.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

Health Care: A Human Rights and Economic Justice Issue

It ultimately falls to us, the patients, to frame health care as a human right and matter of economic justice, alongside national security, public education, and disaster relief.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

A Participatory Medicine Journey

It can be hard to be a vigilant participatory patient. It can be fraught with emotions and fear of repercussion. But it’s harder to be in the dark.

Read More
Letters, Vol. 3, 2011

The Importance of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Participatory Movement

To the Editor: Alternative methods are a significant and important support to healing and, I think, should definitely be included in JoPM’s agenda.

Read More
Commentary, Vol. 3, 2011

One Size Doesn’t Fit All

I have worked for more than 30 years as an Urgent Care/Emergency physician, and found that an unstable ER cardiac patient is looking for a different interaction than a patient with chronic issues or health concerns working with a primary care provider.

Read More
Letters, Vol. 3, 2011

Letter: Developing a Positive Patient-Provider Relationship

I would like to elaborate on Mr. Scott’s points about development of a positive relationship between patients and health care providers. Just as health care providers are accused of possessing an edge of arrogance, patients sometimes possess the same; it’s a two-way street.

Read More
Letters, Vol. 3, 2011

Response to “The Term ‘Patient’ May Describe Me…But It Does Not Define Me.”

A round of applause, please, for Michael Scott’s recent commentary. What struck me immediately was that this is something that is not confined to participatory medicine; society needs this seismic shift in relation to everything.

Read More
Letters, Vol. 2, 2010

Response to “Evidence that Engagement Does Make a Difference”

Why do patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) opt out of surgery as a treatment option? Having been there with my wife, who survived NSCLC, (Stage 4; re-staged to Stage 2 after chemo), I can offer several reasons based upon real-life experience.

Read More

Feedback

Name:
Email:
Message:
 captcha